<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you&#8217;re TAX EXEMPT you better watch out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:52:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/comment-page-1/#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>I think that if voter guides are going to be passed out at church then information about all parties involved should be passed out fair and square. 

I don&#039;t think elections should be discussed at the pulpit OR candidates invited to speak. 

Praying for the outcome without saying which side should win the election is ok.

What is very confusing to me is how churches get away with having a candidate come to speak? That&#039;s what I don&#039;t understand.

I hope you guys will read Kelly&#039;s post over on B5 media. I provided a link in the original post I wrote. It&#039;s very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if voter guides are going to be passed out at church then information about all parties involved should be passed out fair and square. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think elections should be discussed at the pulpit OR candidates invited to speak. </p>
<p>Praying for the outcome without saying which side should win the election is ok.</p>
<p>What is very confusing to me is how churches get away with having a candidate come to speak? That&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
<p>I hope you guys will read Kelly&#8217;s post over on B5 media. I provided a link in the original post I wrote. It&#8217;s very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayla McCord</title>
		<link>http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/comment-page-1/#comment-7384</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayla McCord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angela-stevens.com/archives/if-youre-tax-exempt-you-better-watch-out/#comment-7384</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think churches should be involved in the voting process in any way shape or form and still be allowed to maintain a tax exempt status.

If some of these churches had to pay even a small portion of taxes perhaps our taxes wouldn&#039;t be so damn high.

If an evangelist can afford a $20,000 toilet they need to be paying taxes.

That&#039;s one big crock of crap - literally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think churches should be involved in the voting process in any way shape or form and still be allowed to maintain a tax exempt status.</p>
<p>If some of these churches had to pay even a small portion of taxes perhaps our taxes wouldn&#8217;t be so damn high.</p>
<p>If an evangelist can afford a $20,000 toilet they need to be paying taxes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one big crock of crap &#8211; literally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
